Skip to main content

When Digital Photography Was New

Do you recall the first time you saw a digital photograph and what you thought of it?

I do: I remember thinking it looked too sharp, the fall-off between the edges and the elements behind too abrupt, and the colors too vivid. I was absolutely used to the way that film looked, and I wasn’t alone. In fact, the film manufacturers had spent the best part of a fifty years developing films that rendered photographs to look the way we see the world.

Or rather, they developed a range of color films to meet the demands of different customers. Some films suited the general buying public. Others had more muted colors and were designed for portrait and wedding photographers. Another, with its bright, punchy color, was a favorite of landscape and flower photographers.

But within that range they all represented reality in a way we found acceptable. Or rather, they did so in their latest incarnations.

Take a look at some of the color films from the seventies though. Even without the changes that time has wrought on their unstable emulsions, people had yellow or red faces, the sea could be any color but blue, and the sky might be something only science-fiction writers wrote about.

In truth, what is acceptable is not fixed. After all, with most fashions – from clothing to furniture – what might seem odd or outlandish one year can be mainstream the next.

So what has happened to digital photographs in the past ten years? Have we changed or have the photographs changed? Have we simply come to accept a different ‘look’?

Five years ago the photography magazines and forums often compared film and digital capture and concluded that there was no point in swimming against the tide and that we all ‘had to’ accept that film and digital capture looked different – neither was right nor wrong – just different.

Not so today. The sensors and the processing engine in digital cameras have improved so much that we can now pretty much choose how we want our digital images to look. You want it to look like film? – it can do so. You want it to look like it was etched with a precision laser tool? – you can have that too.

-->

Tagged as: digital photography

Posted via web from hotpixel

Popular posts from this blog

Giveaway Tools

After looking at an article on InsightScope about contest giveaways, I just read the FAQs for one of the tools, which is KingSumo Giveaway and I see that as at the time the FAQs were prepared, the tool doesn't integrate with Mailchimp. Instead you have to download a CSV and upload.Also, there is a warning that the tool may not be compatible with Facebook's terms in the future.Finally, there is a long, convoluted way you have to deal with duplicate content, which is described in the FAQs as follows: I’m concerned about duplicate pages for SEO We don’t create new pages, just add a parameter to your URLS. Google just sees the original page and URL structure. What we recommend if Google results are important is to run the tool, then once it looks like a winner I’d change the Title to the winner and the original URL. Remove the other titles. We are working on a fix to make this easier.Advanced users:Utilize the parameter tools in Google’s Webmaster Tools and set the Headline plugi…

MarsEdit 4

I've been using MarsEdit for just over seven years. I started with version 2, and then upgraded to version 3 in 2010.Now, in 2018, I just upgraded to version 4. This is my first post with the upgrade and I'll report on it in a little while as I get used to the new version.Here is what Daniel of Red Sweater Software has to say about his product:Browser-based interfaces are slow, clumsy, and require you to be online just to use them. Browsers are perfect for reading web content, but not ideal for creating it. If you're serious about writing for the web, you need a desktop blog editor. If you're lucky enough to have a Mac, nothing is more powerful, or more elegant than MarsEditRich and Plain Text Editing MarsEdit's editor switches easily from Plain to Rich Text, so you can work in whichever format you prefer. Love Markdown? MarsEdit can preview it and convert it to HTML if needed.Wildly Compatible Works with WordPress, Blogger, Tumblr, TypePad, Movable Type, and any …

Business For Britain Is Concerned With Business For Britain

This report in the New York Times today


LONDON — Is British business fretting about the risks of the country drifting out of the European Union? Or does it crave a looser relationship with Continental allies, one free from meddlesome regulation?
The answer to that question remained unclear Monday after a newly formed group of business leaders argued for a renegotiation of Britain’s membership terms — echoing the policy of Prime Minister David Cameron, who in January promised voters a referendum on whether the country would remain in the Union.
The new group, called Business for Britain, is intended to counter the intervention of pro-E.U. business leaders who have warned of the dangers of Britain slipping out of the 27-nation bloc and its single market of 500 million people. A statement released Monday to announce the group’s formation was signed by about 500 executives.
I think this opinion in the New York Times article is interesting:

Never much attracted to the idea of European unity,…