Skip to main content

Intel to Pay AMD $1.25 Billion in Settlement for 'all outstanding legal complaints'


Feuding chip rivals Intel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. on Thursday agreed to settle all of their outstanding legal complaints, with Intel paying AMD $1.25 billion and agreeing to abide by a set of rules for how it conducts business.

The agreement, which also includes a renewed five-year cross-licensing pact, comes as Intel announced the selection of A. Douglas Melamed as its general counsel, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Melamed, a partner at WilmerHale in Washington, has decades of antitrust experience.

The company faces increasing scrutiny from government regulators regarding alleged anticompetitive practices. Intel and AMD make nearly all the chips used to run computers and servers, though the much larger Intel controls roughly 80% of the market.

AMD shares rose $1.07, or 20%, to $6.39 in late-morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Intel shares fell three cents to $19.81 on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Legal and regulatory battles have increasingly been turning against Intel. Roger Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies Associates, which tracks the field, said that by settling, Intel may have alleviated some of the pressure regarding the cases brought by others.

"It was only going to get more expensive the farther down the litigation road they went, and this takes a lot of wind out of the sails of the other suits," Mr. Kay said. "Intel may have just reduced its legal tab by a number of billions of dollars."

The settlement was sorely needed for AMD, which has struggled with mounting losses and high debt levels related to its acqusition of graphics-chip maker ATI Technologies. With the lawsuit and other legal disputes now behind it, the company removes a serious investor concern, said Wedbush Morgan analyst Patrick Wang.

"AMD's liquidity issues are going to be taken away," Mr. Wang said. "This is something that is going to take away a major overhang for investors."

For its part, AMD said "the game has changed" in the chip business because of its strategies..

"We are optimistic that [the settlement] will usher a new era for our industry," said Dirk Meyer, AMD's chief executive officer, in prepared remarks.

Besides the money, the company pointed to provisions in the deal that affect how Intel does business in selling the chips that serve as brains in computers.

"We recognize that it will take time for people to understand how the operating conditions in processor business have changed—but make no mistake—they have changed," Mr. Meyer said.

He added: "Today marks the beginning of a new that confirms that the game has changed for AMD."

Besides the private antitrust case that AMD filed against Intel in a Delaware federal court, Intel has faced investigations in South Korea, Japan, Europe and in the U.S. by the Federal Trade Commission and the New York attorney general.

This year, the European Commission levied the largest antitrust fine in its history against Intel for anticompetitive practices.

Mr. Melamed, meahwile, has 30 years of experience in antitrust law, according to his biography on the WilmerHale Web site. The site says Mr. Melamed worked at the Justice Department, where he was acting assistant attorney general in charge of the antitrust division, between October 1996 and January 2001.

Intel's board selected Mr. Melamed Wednesday night, one person said.

Mr. Melamen was tentatively offered the position two weeks ago but didn't accept it right away, according to a longtime acquaintance. He is a "very intellectual" antitrust specialist, with a reputation as being "very technically and academically'' inclined, the acquaintance said.

As Intel's top lawyer, Mr. Melamen will prove very helpful in navigating its current legal problems because "he knows every player around the world in antitrust,'' this acquaintance added.

Mr. Melamed fills a position that had been vacant since September, when longtime general counsel Bruce Sewell left the company for Apple Inc.

—Don Clark, Dionne Searcey and Joann Lublin contributed to this article.

Posted via web from hotpixel


Popular posts from this blog

MarsEdit 4

I've been using MarsEdit for just over seven years. I started with version 2, and then upgraded to version 3 in 2010.Now, in 2018, I just upgraded to version 4. This is my first post with the upgrade and I'll report on it in a little while as I get used to the new version.Here is what Daniel of Red Sweater Software has to say about his product:Browser-based interfaces are slow, clumsy, and require you to be online just to use them. Browsers are perfect for reading web content, but not ideal for creating it. If you're serious about writing for the web, you need a desktop blog editor. If you're lucky enough to have a Mac, nothing is more powerful, or more elegant than MarsEditRich and Plain Text Editing MarsEdit's editor switches easily from Plain to Rich Text, so you can work in whichever format you prefer. Love Markdown? MarsEdit can preview it and convert it to HTML if needed.Wildly Compatible Works with WordPress, Blogger, Tumblr, TypePad, Movable Type, and any …

Resistance Is Futile

Some of the trains that run from London Kings Cross to Cambridge divide at Cambridge. Part of the train goes on to Kings Lynn and the rest stops at Cambridge and does the run back to London. Perhaps it picks up other carriages coming from somewhere else, I don’t know but it seems likely.When you get on the train and before it sets off, there’s a public announcement announcing how the train divides. It explains that the train is composed of eight carriages and that passengers wanting to travel beyond Cambridge should ensure that they are in the front four carriages.The rear four carriages are of course nearest the barrier, so we choose to sit in one of those carriages if for no other reason than that we don’t have to walk so far to find a seat.So there we are and the voice comes over with the announcement. And then there is a pause and then a voice tells you what carriage you are in. So we hear ‘Six of Eight’ or ‘Seven of Eight’ – and every time I hear it I think of Star Trek, ‘Three o…

Business For Britain Is Concerned With Business For Britain

This report in the New York Times today

LONDON — Is British business fretting about the risks of the country drifting out of the European Union? Or does it crave a looser relationship with Continental allies, one free from meddlesome regulation?
The answer to that question remained unclear Monday after a newly formed group of business leaders argued for a renegotiation of Britain’s membership terms — echoing the policy of Prime Minister David Cameron, who in January promised voters a referendum on whether the country would remain in the Union.
The new group, called Business for Britain, is intended to counter the intervention of pro-E.U. business leaders who have warned of the dangers of Britain slipping out of the 27-nation bloc and its single market of 500 million people. A statement released Monday to announce the group’s formation was signed by about 500 executives.
I think this opinion in the New York Times article is interesting:

Never much attracted to the idea of European unity,…