And to those who argue that all that matters is that open source is a better way to develop code, let this case be a warning message. Apple makes fabulous code. Of course, the BSD community did a lot of it for them, but Apple makes it all just work for end users, and they do that beautifully. So no one can argue that for end users it is not fabulous code. It is.
So here is my question: is that enough?
Or isn't the message of this case that what you really want with your fabulous code is freedom for the code? If you answer yes, I want freedom to do what I want with code on my home computer, then why use proprietary code? Proprietary vendors are happy to sell you the best code in the world, if they have it. But they won't sell you freedom to use it any way you want. That's not the business they are in.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
A Lovely Extract From Groklaw on Apple v Psystar
I've been using MarsEdit for just over seven years. I started with version 2, and then upgraded to version 3 in 2010. Now, in 2018, I...
I am pleased to be able to make the statement in the title to this article and I want to explain how I have done it and how I came to hear ...
After looking at an article on InsightScope about contest giveaway s, I just read the FAQs for one of the tools, which is KingSumo Giveaway ...